---

From: interphil-bounces@polylog.org on behalf of Bertold Bernreuter
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 03:32

---

From: owner-philosop@marnier.louisiana.edu on behalf of Mark Moller moller@denison.edu
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 03:04
To: Philosop@louisiana.edu
Subject: William James Studies

We are pleased to announce that a new issue of William James Studies (WJS) is available online at http://williamjamesstudies.press.uiuc.edu/. 

 

---

From: philosophy-updates@googlegroups.com on behalf of juli.eflin@ballstate.bsu.edu
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 01:23
To: philosophy-updates@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PhilUpdates] CFP: Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal

 

 

 

A position is vacant at the Centre for Philosophical Psychology of the
University of Antwerp (www.ua.ac.be/philosophicalpsychology) for a qualifie=
d
pre-doctoral philosopher to participate in the project 'Senses as tools. A
philosophy of the sensory modalities', funded by the Research Foundation -
Flanders (runtime 2009-2013).

Applicants should have an excellent curriculum, and a verifiable interest i=
n
the philosophy of congitive science and/or the philosophy of mind.

The successful applicant will be hired for four years, at the end of which =
a
PhD, based on papers written during the course of the project, has to be
defended. The project's promotor is Erik Myin (www.ua.ac.be/erik.myin), who
will actively participate in the research.


Those interested can send an e-mail to Erik.Myin@ua.ac.be, adding a short C=
V
and indicating when she or he will be available.


Below one finds a short descripton of the project. An extended version can
be obtained upon request.



SENSES AS TOOLS: A PHILOSOPHY OF THE SENSORY MODALITIES

Perception has an objective and a subjective aspect. We perceive events and
objects, but at the same time these appear to us in a certain manner. An
important role in the determination of =8Chow object appear to us=B9 is played
by the sensory modalities. Philosophers from Aristotle to Paul Grice have
considered the question what precisely distinguishes the senses: What makes
hearing into hearing, and seeing into seeing? But also the question of what
connects the sensory modalities has strongly attracted the philosophical
attention. This is what is at issue in the famous Molyneux Question: What
would happen if a blind person, capable of tactile recognition of a sphere
or a cube, suddenly gained the capacity of sight? Would he be able to
distinguish by looking the sphere from the cube? In the proposed project th=
e
two questions regarding what distinguishes and connects the senses will be
reconsidered from the combined perspective of the sensorimotor contingency
theory for perception and perceptual awareness and of the ideas of Andy
Clark about the =8CExtended Mind=B9 and his hypothesis that humans are
Natural-Born Cyborgs: Creatures which integrate external tools into their
behaviour in such a way that these become literally part of themselves. On
the basis of the conception of the senses constructed from this perspective=
,
an account will be given of what distinguishes and connects the senses, and
it will be investigated how this conception allows to relieve the tension
between how objects appear to us, and how they are. The proposed theory of
the senses has important implications regarding the debate between
internalists and externalists about whether the mind is =8Cin the head=B9, or
extends into the environment.

Messages to the list are archived at http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html.
Prolonged discussions should be moved to chora: enrol via
http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/chora.html.
Other philosophical resources on the Web can be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/pal.

Please circulate to anyone potentially interested. Many thanks.

Post-doctoral Hoover Fellowship in Economic and Social Ethics
Université catholique de Louvain 2009-2010

Thanks to the continued support of the Hoover Foundation for the Development of the Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), the Hoover Chair of Economic and Social Ethics hosts every year a number of post-doctoral fellows. The fellowhip is intended for scholars from outside Belgium, who hold a doctorate or possess equivalent qualifications and are active in the field of economic or social ethics. At least some rudiments of French and an active knowledge of either English or French are required.
Fellows with no other source of income are offered an all-inclusive gross monthly stipend of Euros 2000 for a period not exceeding 5 months. Fellows on paid leave from their own institution are offered a contribution to their travelling and housing expenses. All fellows are expected to stay for at least one month. They are provided with office space, internet connection, free access to various other services, some secretarial assistance and help in finding accommodation. They will be expected to take an active part in the Chaire Hoover's activities and will have access to the University's seminars, lecture courses and libraries.
Applications from scholars with an active interest in the main research themes of the members of the Hoover Chair are particularly welcome. These themes include critical political economy, distributive justice, the social responsibilty of economic actors, basic income and the future of the welfare state, deliberation and publicity in collective decision making, workplace democracy, institutional design for divided societies, linguistic justice, the legitimacy of tradable quotas, etc. For more details, see the presentation of the members of the Chair and many (downloadable) publications on http://www.uclouvain.be/chaire-hoover. General information about the University and its Faculties can be found on  http://www.uclouvain.be/index.html

If you wish to apply, we need to receive by 28 February 2009 preferably by e-mail:
1. A letter (in French or English) stating briefly
- your current research interests, and in particular what you intend working on during your stay;
- your linguistic abilities;
- whether you would be on paid leave from your own institution during your stay;
- your preferences as to the length and timing of your stay ;
- whether you intend coming with your family.
2. a detailed Curriculum Vitae;
3. two reference letters (e-mailed directly by their authors).
An acknowledgement will be sent upon receipt of your application.
Thérèse Davio
Université catholique de Louvain, Chaire Hoover d'éthique économique et sociale
3 Place Montesquieu, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Phone : +32 10 473951 Fax : +32 10 473952
E-mail : therese.davio@uclouvain.be

Sydney-Tilburg conference on

EVIDENCE, SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY

Sydney Centre for the Foundations of Science
26-28 March 2009

Conference website:
http://sydcfs.org.au/

*********************************************************************


KEYNOTE SPEAKERS: Mark Burgman (University of Melbourne), John Quiggin
(University of Queensland) and John Worrall (London School of Economics)

ORGANISERS: Mark Colyvan (Sydney), Stephan Hartmann (Tilburg), James Justus
(Sydney) and Jan Sprenger (Tilburg)

The relationship between science and public policy is complex. Good public
policy on matters such as the environment, climate change, health, the
economy, and justice must be informed by good science. But this science
needs to be conducted in ways amenable to the needs of the policy makers and
the results communicated in ways accessible to both the policy makers and
the public at large. Public policy issues might even impinge on the science
itself. For example, acceptable levels of error might be thought to be
determined by the consequences of the decisions to be made using the
scientific findings. This raises many interesting philosophical questions
about the relationship between science, evidence and public policy. Should
science remain independent of policy decisions and concern itself only with
evidence? Is this possible? What is evidence-based medicine and does it live
up to its advertising? What is evidence-based public policy and what does it
offer above standard policy making? Our goal in this conference is to bring
together philosophers of science, political philosophers, policy makers, and
other researchers interested in the science-policy interface. We welcome
papers on any of the above questions as well as papers on broader issues
concerning evidence, especially in applied contexts (e.g. legal, medical,
and environmental).

We invite submissions of extended abstracts of up to 1000 words by 1
December 2008. Decisions will be made by 15 January 2009.

Messages to the list are archived at http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html.
Prolonged discussions should be moved to chora: enrol via
http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/chora.html.
Other philosophical resources on the Web can be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/pal.

---

From: Pancucci, Valerie [mailto:valerie.pancucci@kcl.ac.uk]
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 11:57

 

The King’s Lecture in Ethics

 

Aiding the World's Poor:

New Challenges for Donor States

 

Roger Riddell

Board Member, Oxford Policy Management.

Principal, The Policy Practice.

Formerly: International Director of Christian Aid (1999-2004), and Research Fellow of the Overseas

Development Institute (1983-1999).

Author: Foreign Aid Reconsidered (1985), Does Foreign Aid Really Work? (2007, paperback 2008)

 

19 November 5 - 7pm

King’s College London

Safra Lecture Theatre

Strand

London WC2R 2LS

 

Map: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/campuses/strand-det.html

(Enter building “A” from the Strand, Safra Lecture Theatre is in building “B”)

 

There is a significant and growing literature focused on the question of whether states have a moral obligation to provide aid. Against this backdrop, it is, perhaps, surprising that most rich countries have explicitly stated that they do have a moral obligation to provide aid to poor countries. What remains insufficiently discussed and debated is precisely how that obligation can be, or ought to be fulfilled. This issue has become more urgent in recent years as new thinking by the major donors about the purpose of aid raises new questions and presents new dilemmas for the discussion of the ethical issues raised in rich states providing aid to poor countries.

 

 

No ticket is required. This event is free and open to all.

 

Questions and comments from the audience will be welcomed.

 

 

 

PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

The King’s Lecture in Ethics

MAKING MEDICINES

ACCESSIBLE FOR ALL

 

The UK Launch of a Major New Public Health Initiative

 

THE HEALTH IMPACT FUND

Proposed as a new international agency that would reward

new medicines based on their impact on global health.

 

◊

 

27 NOVEMBER

King’s College London

Franklin-Wilkins Bldg (South Bank, just east of the IMAX)

Refreshments 5–6pm, Speakers 6–7pm, Panel discussion with leaders from

government, the pharmaceutical industry, and NGOs 7–8pm, Questions and

comments from the audience 8–9pm

 

◊

 

THOMAS POGGE        AIDAN HOLLIS

      Yale University                                          University of Calgary

 

Profs. Pogge & Hollis will introduce the Health Impact Fund, followed by the discussions.

The event is free, unticketed, and open to all.

 

www.healthimpactfund.org

 

 

---

From: owner-newjour@ccat.sas.upenn.edu on behalf of News of New Electronic Journals
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 13:41
To: newjour@ccat.sas.upenn.edu
Subject: Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine

---

From: esap-news@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Jussi Haukioja
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 09:03
To: esap-news@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [esap-news] Workshop on Concepts and Intuitions

 
__,_._,___

---

From: Charters, Erica E.Charters@liverpool.ac.uk 
Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 11:05

Dear List

I'm posting this on behalf of my friends in Philosophy For All.

Rick

----------------------------------------------

This will be held at the Mary Ward Centre, 42 Queen Square , London WC1,

from 2 to 5 pm on Saturday 29 November.  Daniel Hutto, who is a professor

at the University of Hertfordshire, will be talking about Wittgenstein and

the purpose of philosophy.

The format of these lectures allows much more time for questions and discussion than is normally the case, the lecturer speaking for about 45 minutes, the remaining time being for discussion.

Admission free, all welcome.

Andrew Dodsworth

PFA Secretary

----------------------------------------------

--